Okay, didn't mean to come out swinging, just a habit on internet forums anymore I guess.

To try to discuss more productively: I already thought Monet was overrated, and this was a long-held and considered opinion, not just a knee-jerk reaction to this post.

The post seemed to serve as a pepsi-challenge that confirmed what I already thought, but you're right that it's all cherrypicked anyway. That's the part I didn't consider so carefully.

That's fair. I on the other hand thought I was reading a dismissal based on nothing but some tweets (of all things), but in the end that was just an assumption I made.

I notice that were doing this underneath these words:

> Hopefully it helps people to at least be more conscious of their bias.

Oh, well. Is this how it feels when it's working?