| ▲ | Ajedi32 4 hours ago | |||||||
I'm a bit out of the loop, but has SpaceX not been profitable for the last 4 quarters? I understand they're investing a lot into R&D for Starship but I was under the impression they've been making a killing on Starlink. | ||||||||
| ▲ | _aavaa_ an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Maybe, but since then it has absorbed xAI and Twitter, neither of which are known for producing money. | ||||||||
| ▲ | jmuguy 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Starlink itself is profitable but the insane valuation they're trying to get for the IPO is based on an assumed continued massive growth of users - and even then I don't think Starlink by itself makes SpaceX a trillion dollar company. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | jauntywundrkind 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Past performance as a company is like 20% of the concern here. The concern is ~80% that a brand new stock enters the market & immediately has to be bought by everyone. The market has no time to adjust & settle. This is fleecing everyone & it's entirely unclear under what madness this would ever have been considered. There's so many irregularities and abnormalities being considered here, and all of them seem like pretty straightforward safeguards. It feels like nothing short of a conspiracy that so many norms would be pushed aside to consider listing spacex so quickly in so many indexes. "The proposal could also remove the minimum Investable Weight Factor requirement for megacap companies." For fuck sake! https://x.com/Benzinga/status/2050244492335206911 | ||||||||