| ▲ | jcarlosweb 7 hours ago | |
But that was in America, where big corporations do whatever they want; in Europe, that shouldn't be allowed. Changing just a few lines in the open-source licenses could save us in the future. | ||
| ▲ | ben_w 6 hours ago | parent [-] | |
> But that was in America, where big corporations do whatever they want; The ruling was very much not "big corporations do whatever they want", hence where I wrote "while copyright infringement (AKA piracy) to get the training data for training an AI is still copyright infringement" > Changing just a few lines in the open-source licenses could save us in the future. Could? No, not when so much of the coding work gets done in America. Not when the leading AI are American models. Not when so much of the open source code itself is American in origin. Not when the code is hosted on American servers. Now, the code AI makes being bad, that might save our profession, but I'm not counting on it. I've not figured out what to do next, but I don't think I'm staying in software. | ||