> in some left-wing corners of the commentariat, is out; flagrant disregard of the social contract is in.

Interesting that this is posed as the American left disregarding the social contract. I think you could make a pretty good case that the American right disregarded the social contract first in electing an extremely destructive pedophile who starts wars for reasons that can't even be articulated, pardons war criminals, engages in blatant nepotism enriching his family to the tune of billions at taxpayer's expense, large-scale fraud including being convicted of felony, adjudicated rapist, and a list of social contract violations going on for about 300 more pages that I'd be here all day typing out. And once the social contract is gone, it would be pretty weird to expect the other side to continue abiding by the terms. I don't personally make a habit of binding myself to one-sided contracts that impose no obligations on the other party.

▲

willis936 13 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

You left out shredding the constitution and inciting a coup.

▲

nlawalker 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>Interesting that this is posed as the American left disregarding the social contract.

Yeah no kidding, where's the commentary on the "right-wing corners" that are rolling coal, "owning the libs", storming the Capitol, denying vaccine science and refusing to wear masks during a pandemic etc., and the consideration of whether this posture is a frustrated response to that.

	▲	pixl97 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Also the right wing love to ignore every single bit of their own crimes. It's like the idea that those that voted for Trump have never committed misdemeanors cannot even be discussed, when the actual crime statistics show that yea, they are just as apt to load up the steaks and walk out of the store. But I will say they've done a damned good job controlling the conversation so it's not brought up in the first place.

▲

remarkEon 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I can assure you with 100% certainty that the American Right did not elect Bill Clinton.

▲

elictronic 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If you can’t understand the difference, I’m honestly impressed you remembered your password.

▲

triceratops 43 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Statistically maybe half the people who voted for Bill Clinton are already dead.

▲

InsideOutSanta 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I'm no fan of Clinton, but pretending that he's even remotely as bad as Trump only confirms how leftists see people on the right.

	▲	b65e8bee43c2ed0 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		the people who got bombed during Clinton's tenure must've been delighted that their children were murdered and their homes were destroyed in a humane manner by a cool sax-playing pedo rather than a cringe orange pedo. B52 dropping bombs vs B52 with BLM and LGBT stickers dropping bombs.jpg

▲

9x39 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Is this an announcement of engaging in these behaviors?

What will change once you no longer feel bound to this contract?

▲

applfanboysbgon 2 hours ago | parent [-]

To be clear, I do not live in America. Not every place in the world has wantonly abandoned the social contract.

Everything changes when people no longer feel bound to it, so it's an outcome you should rather desire to avoid. Some examples are the shoplifting mentioned in the article, Luigi Mangione, or the guy who threw molotovs at Altman's mansion. The justice system is a mutual agreement to forsake violence owing to the belief that conflicts and grievances can be mediated in a peaceful manner. If that belief dies, if people believe the justice system and government can not be trusted to deliver justice to violators of the social contract and compensation to the wronged, then people will take matters into their own hands by any means necessary. It is not a pretty state of affairs, but perhaps the people who initially disregarded the contract might've considered that before disposing of it.

	▲	pixl97 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		There are a few slight problems here. The US justice system has always existed to benefit the rich and or majority of the time. I mean, really American history is filled with example where those in power ignored the less powerful below them and social unrest broke out. Every once in a while a rich person got blasted for the absolute unethical behavior they were engaged in. Again, that is nothing new. What is new is media and how people are subjected to this. There is no such thing as a local problem any longer. Anything at anytime can get shown to the entire world even if it's not real. So suddenly what would be an issue has thousands to millions of people talking about it. Unlike old media where they had some semblance of decorum, you get groups saying the most outrageous shit in an attempt to whip up crowds, it's even better when we find out later they've been paid off by foreign nationals and are acting like agents.