| ▲ | w10-1 2 days ago | |
Consider a couple similar situations: 1. Many teachers don't publish, and those that do publish often still reserve their best for their students. 2. OS development sometimes operates like esoteric societies: you publish enough that people with the desire and insight become interested and engaged - both a filter and an invitation. So you can tailor the community you like. Both depend on people really valuing these mutually-constitutive relationships. My observation is that the generations raised on social media and gaming are happy enough with those substitutes, and view publishing their best work as a kind of self-promotion and participation in a larger, diffuse community (without a real role in governance). And they're right: expecting more personal communities now is a severely limiting factor, and AI removes most of the incentives to participate in someone else's project. | ||