I want to set one up now and use it to call out the city board members taking kickbacks from flock.

pugworthy 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This is probably not the kind of approach to taking out new domain names you should encourage. A lot of other causes might think this is their way to set up an "official" representation of their strongly held political beliefs, and I think you can imagine where that might go with some groups.

	▲	vasco 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		"Don't use your free speech because other people might use theirs in ways you don't like"

▲

prepend 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Why would city board members care what your domain name is?

▲

dawnerd 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Oh they probably don't. But it might annoy them slightly if the foia docs were hosted there.

	▲	toast0 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		My city already has to publicly list and host foia requests and host documents provided, if they were provided electronically. Most of the requests are for permit drawings, which are provided on paper to the local reprographics company and are not digitized, but most of the potentially annoying requests result in a pdf that's publicly available from a portal linked by the city. Not sure why it would be annoying, even in the slightest, to have it also available somewhere else.