| ▲ | bluecheese452 an hour ago |
| That is mostly true but a bit of a simplification. They exist to do what the people who have power want them to do which is not always strictly profit maximization. A ceo may realize rto will decrease profits but do it anyway because it increases the power delta between him and the workers. |
|
| ▲ | nervousvarun an hour ago | parent [-] |
| "not always strictly profit maximization." Maybe in the short-term but public companies with shareholders won't allow this in any sort of long-term way right? |
| |
| ▲ | bluecheese452 an hour ago | parent [-] | | Not allow it? They insist upon it! The controlling votes are all part of the same social class. They would gladly give up a small amount of profit to keep the distance between them and the workers as large as possible. | | |
| ▲ | nervousvarun 37 minutes ago | parent [-] | | To the extent it doesn't negatively impact the stock price sure but you would agree the CEO and any sort of power-trip they have is ultimately beholden to that right? | | |
| ▲ | bluecheese452 21 minutes ago | parent [-] | | If he goes against what they want absolutely. If he introduced a 4 day work week for example he would be in big trouble. |
|
|
|