| ▲ | MrFurious 3 hours ago | |||||||
The "social component" is a big problem in actual FOSS. | ||||||||
| ▲ | rapnie 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
People forget what FOSS is, and you get a world of unclear expectations. FOSS is code + a copyright license. How the code is created is an entirely different matter, and where FOSS projects often fall short. As FOSS projects come Forgejo is well-organized around a community governance model. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | marcosdumay 31 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Yes, what's one more reason to abandon the largest platform. | ||||||||
| ▲ | locknitpicker 40 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
> The "social component" is a big problem in actual FOSS. You're confusing things. The "social component" refers to people interacting with each other. Such as two developers working on a bug or a feature. Or a tester reporting a bug. This is a big part of actual professional software development work. | ||||||||
| ▲ | bbor an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
IDK, it's hard to criticize the community too much given how wildly, absurdly successful it is. If I arrived on Earth yesterday and you tried to tell me how much software is Free/free in an otherwise-capitalist economy, I wouldn't believe you! I really really am not trying to start a political argument, but just as food for thought: this is exactly why I have faith in socialism (read: 'prosocial institutions and norms'). And whether socialism is eu- or dys-topian, it certainly cannot happen in the first place without a "social component"! | ||||||||