polski-g 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Its fine if they offer that. But states need to make them liable for damages if it causes harm. The First Amendment protects them from criminal liability, but not civil. TOS' should not be able to shield them from the civil liability either.

anon291 a day ago | parent | prev [-]

to the contrary... this is a specific product whith is on a waitlist. Normal ChatGPT is not for health advice.

▲

justinclift 21 hours ago | parent [-]

The front and center most-of-page video on that literally has this in big arse font displayed at page load time:

> Every day, millions of people ask ChatGPT for support with their health

Second paragraph of the main page text then says:

> Health is already one of the most common ways people use ChatGPT, with hundreds of millions of people asking health and wellness questions each week

Clearly ChatGPT is positioned for providing health advice in their main, non-specialised product, not just in their dedicated "Health" product.

▲

Wowfunhappy 21 hours ago | parent [-]

Millions of people do this thing ≠ we recommend that people do this thing

	▲	zephen 20 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Millions of people do this thing that we know about and brag about and don't discourage because it makes us a metric shitton of money == ringing fucking endorsement, fuck yeah!