| ▲ | jorvi 3 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The M1 Ultra got 70% of the frames of an RTX 3090 on Tomb Raider[0], so I suppose they're right. Performance-per-watt monsters. And Apple GPUs have only gotten better. [0]https://techjourneyman.com/img/blog/m1-ultra-vs-rtx-3090-ben... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | bigyabai 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
That wasn't really my question. The M1 Ultra is a 5nm chip up against the 8nm RTX 3090 - for >$2000 and 220W+ you'd kinda hope the M1 Ultra outperforms the 8nm stuff. My question is, what games are people playing on Mac? Tomb Raider is one of ~6 AAA titles that was ported to Mac in the last decade. All the other big-ticket games - GTA V, Arc Raiders, Elden Ring - are all hamstrung by Apple's terrible translation software and don't run much better with Crossover either. Apple Silicon, strictly speaking, is the least adept hardware that you can own for gaming. If you are a gamer, almost every single other GPU on the market would perform better for your needs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | izacus 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
You really had to squeeze those numbers through those filters to get that diction out, didn't you? :P My 16" M1 Max is kinda crap at running games - I'd put it somewhere around cheaper laptops with 3050 series GPUs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||