Remix.run Logo
arjie 3 hours ago

I imagine they're going to do the same thing with this as with Chromebooks: i.e. do enterprise deals with schools and so on? Google's iteration-style structure where they kill products is fine for SaaS type offerings that are free and that you don't build your world around, but buying a laptop they won't support soon enough isn't that useful. Ultimately, just like with Amazon and their phone, it's obvious even prior to release that this is not a priority for the company and the side gig type stuff doesn't work when you are selling hardware.

Might have been more interesting if it were under a separate company that Google owned a large portion of, rather than carrying the Google brand. Then again, maybe the Google brand isn't toxic to the wider ecosystem of buyers. I still think consumer-hardware-wise Google is the Safeway Essentials version of Apple but others might think Gmail or Google itself which consumers consider best in class.

frevib 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Please not the schools. We don’t need privacy-invading closed systems with built-in slot machines. We need deterministic open systems where kids’ privacy is protected.

Please not schools…

throwfish3000 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Chromebooks that run on Google services are already the default 1:1 device in schools. They're cheap, they take a beating and have good battery life.

frevib 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Same here. They’re subsidized by taking kids’ privacy.

dormento an hour ago | parent [-]

And normalizing google's model of computing, surveillance, locked down platforms etc...

dpoloncsak 39 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'd assume this opens up 'Googlebooks' to compete with the GPU/M Series Premium laptops so schools can provide them to teach things like Photoshop, Illustrator, CAD Design, anything that chromebooks couldn't do, right?

PaulHoule 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The performance of the machine offered at schools seems to get just a little worse every year too... like one of these days they won't have to worry about kids playing Krunker in class because they won't be able to.

Brainspackle 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

My kids schools all use ipads

2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
7734128 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It would be so much better for the student's IT proficiencies if the were some ordinary Linux computers instead. Preferably with limited central managment.

The Chromebooks are probably cheaper than the hardware itself could be, but that's a good demonstration of the issue.

afavour 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It wouldn’t. The central management of Chromebook is what makes the whole system usable. All you’d be doing is sentencing school IT folks to endless, endless support requests.

jakeydus 22 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Sorry, I love Linux, but could you imagine managing a fleet of the cheapest hardware possible and also teaching a bunch of 6th graders how to use Linux? School IT workers are already heroes. I don't like Google, but they're a necessary evil to keep those guys from tearing their hair out every day unless we dedicate significantly more resources to computing in schools.

sowbug 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Who would run the cloud side, or at least the networked backup service?

bko 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> We need deterministic open systems where kids’ privacy is protected

I don't think we need any computers really. They'll be inundated with computers and technology their whole lives. They'll figure it out. Just keep this tech out of the classroom altogether.

We've had computers in the classroom for over a decade now, scores and learning has not gone up. It's a failed experiment.

davedx an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Why are you opposed to using personal computers for education?

JumpCrisscross an hour ago | parent [-]

> Why are you opposed to using personal computers for education?

They'll have computers at home. And the evidence seems to point in one direction: the more exposure kids have to devices, the more stunted their development tends to be. Add to that the class division, where rich kids are increasingly raised with strictly-policed device exposure, while poor kids' classrooms are littered with iPads and Chrombooks, and I think we can start making blanket statements.

afavour 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I don’t think we need math really. They’ll be inundated with math and arithmetic their whole lives. They’ll figure it out. Just keep math out of the classroom altogether.

kostarelo 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

More montessori-style please.

colinrand 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I could not agree more. We need less tech in classrooms, not more.

andai 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>deterministic open systems

FreeBSD?

Geezus_42 2 hours ago | parent [-]

NixOS?

BakeInBeens 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'd imagine they'll mimic the Chromebook ten year support guarantee, at minimum the eight year guarantee on phones and it'll probably extend to Asus, Dell, HP, and Lenovo models.

Shipping enterprise desktop hardware with AI integrated features will likely be a priority to improve the cloud footprint amongst fortune 500.

sigmoid10 2 hours ago | parent [-]

The EU Cyber Resilience Act already requires updates for at least five years (or the life expectancy of the product) after the last unit was sold. So if they sell them for 5 years, they're barely keeping up with the law. On top of that, there are already voices pushing for mandatory 15 years of support.

xnx 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Then again, maybe the Google brand isn't toxic to the wider ecosystem of buyers.

It's a "most loved" brand according to https://rankings.newsweek.com/americas-most-loved-brands-202...

thevillagechief 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I think it's the overexposure to the inside workings of tech that leads a dislike of these brands. As long as Amazon delivers to you the next day and accepts free returns, you're pretty happy.

HarHarVeryFunny 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's possible (likely?) that if the concept takes off that they might license or give the software away to other hardware vendors, just like the Android ecosystem.

I was anticipating an "AI phone" from someone like Google, not an "AI laptop", although it seems to be Android compatible so maybe that is coming next.

siva7 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What are they trying to gain with this product? Financial incentives obviously won't be the reason as this can only be a loss leader. They have zero chance competing against Apple in the entry market after Apple introduced the neo and obviously no chance in the lucrative premium market against the Apple.

bityard 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This is not an Apple competitor, this looks to me like a rebranding of Chromebook with a bunch of AI sprinkled on top. (There's very little market overlap between the Chromebook and practically any Apple product.)

My guess is that they wanted to name this Geminibook but couldn't for some ultimately uninteresting reason.

jhickok an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Not sure if it matters that they compete with Apple blow-for-blow, it's probably just the threat of existential risk if they don't own any platform. They want to make sure they don't get Facebook'd by Apple if/when they decide to go fully vertical on AI.

jeffbee 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I think you're underestimating Google's ability and willingness to launch and maintain multiple competing products that appear redundant. But you are overstating the lack of support for past ChromeOS devices, because for the enterprise and education markets the support timelines for Chromebooks have been the same as "forever".

toast0 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> But you are overstating the lack of support for past ChromeOS devices, because for the enterprise and education markets the support timelines for Chromebooks have been the same as "forever".

ChromeOS devices fall out of support on a timeline. Google sometimes extends the timeline for some devices, and new devices have a longer timeline than in the past; maybe it's better for Education targeted devices, but the Chromebooks I've had for personal devices stopped getting updates and you're left with whatever state it is in; my first one stopped getting updates in the middle of the printing switch where cloud printing was discontinued and local printing didn't actually work.

My understanding is that Google has announced they will stop development for new ChromeOS devices and ten years after the last device is released (not purchased) support goes poof ... and I imagine support activity for the last 5 years of the last device's ten year support will be a lot less than the first 5 years.