| ▲ | gretch 4 hours ago |
| > The bases got attacked and destroyed with basically zero effort whatsoever, local militaries had to step up to defend the US bases on their own dime and with their own people putting their lives on the line As a US citizen, I hope more countries come to this realization and start rejecting these. It's such a lose-lose for everyone The establishment and maintenance of these bases cost the tax payers so much.... If only we could refocus this massive expenditure of resources to internal domestic infrastructure... |
|
| ▲ | virgildotcodes 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| The America First MAGA people fail so hard to understand that these expenditures on things like foreign bases and US Aid resulted in far greater returns for us. It's never been about altruism or the greater good. I say this as an anti-empirical leftist with no great sympathy for the effort, but for those proclaiming to put America's interests above all else it's just such an obvious and idiotic short-sighted self-own. |
| |
| ▲ | lorecore an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Investing in domestic infrastructure would generate even greater returns. Yes, through some financial hand waving, we may funnel money spent on bombs back to US military contractors, but imagine if that same money was spent on a high speed rail system. It would unlock greater efficiency and logistics with the same money staying with US contractors. That's a purely financial take and not even touching on humanitarian or ecological costs of imperialism. | |
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | NickC25 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | US Aid has probably been the biggest ace the US ever had in its hand. US farmers growing otherwise unprofitable crops with no buyer? Check.
US exporters being able to export crops? Check.
US Aid workers being able to give food to starving people in countries that have huge deposits of rare earth materials? Check.
US intelligence apparatus having advanced knowledge of developing situations in strategically important countries? Check.
US Aid workers being able deliver tremendous goodwill to countries that China or Russia would love to have their tentacles in? Check. Everyone's happy, everyone makes money, everyone eats. Yet Donald Trump and Elon Musk don't like it, so away it goes. And there's no adult in the room to say "no, you're not cutting it, here's why". | | |
| ▲ | ZeroGravitas 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Musk claimed that USAID was a CIA front as part of his rationale to gut it. A very strange thing for a defense contractor to say out loud. | | |
| ▲ | fatbird 23 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I know, this makes me crazy. The response should have been "... and?! You mean the intelligence community has a worldwide network for raking local information that also accrues goodwill to the US, and you want to end that?" |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | pbhjpbhj 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| >The establishment and maintenance of these bases cost the tax payers so much.... They supported USA's hegemony, extension of soft powers - essentially (not a quote) 'we trade with USA because they're our partner, they help us with defence against tyrants'. Except, when USA vote in a fascist tyrant. Many bridges have been burned. USA is just like a company taken over by venture capitalists, and just like such a company those capitalists look like they'll run it into the ground and make off with all the money. |
