| ▲ | horsawlarway 7 hours ago | |||||||
I'm going to suggest that the "buy" case actually has far more interested parties trying to extract money. In no particular order: - Financing company - Realtor x 2 (both seller and buyer) - loan servicing company (may or may not be the financing company) - Insurance companies (multiple, depending on how financing is achieved, everything from property itself, to title, to PMI) - Appraisers - Home inspectors - Closing attorneys - County tax office - City tax office Basically... there's a reason that renting is the right call if you're not buying to hold for at least 5 years, ideally 10. --- There absolutely is speculation in housing markets, but at least in the markets I'm familiar with - it's not really the landlords who are renting houses that are doing the speculation. It's the folks who buy up 100+ houses in depressed/low-income neighborhoods during recessions and then sit on empty property for years. | ||||||||
| ▲ | skillina 7 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
The difference is that all those parties serve a necessary function. We could debate the tax office - arguably the function of a transaction tax is precisely to deter speculation or sales for short-term use. Some speculators serve a necessary function but many do not. In my area it's not uncommon to see homes listed where the last sale was ~6 months ago and it's clear they just slapped some paint on it, replaced appliances in ways that are not generally to my taste, and then doubled the asking price. | ||||||||
| ||||||||