| ▲ | dgellow 3 hours ago |
| GitHub was already pretty much perfected years ago IMHO. I’m not convinced we need that many original ideas here |
|
| ▲ | andy_ppp 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| To build good software you need to think for yourself rather than aimlessly making a pastiche, derivative work never produces good art. |
| |
| ▲ | vkou 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | To build good software you need to take the time to make your existing features work well, and improve or prune the ones that don't. In other words, it is craftsmanship. The American corporation and its values are anathema to craftsmanship. You can ******* a **** all you want, it's never going to turn into gold, but your hands will be covered in crud. | | |
| ▲ | andy_ppp 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I think we are describing the same set of issues with different emphases. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | cortesoft 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Better CI and better search are the two things that are still missing from GitHub |
| |
| ▲ | jamesfinlayson an hour ago | parent [-] | | GitHub had good search but it's been terrible for years now. More recently I think it's only returned results when logged in. |
|