| ▲ | kubik369 4 hours ago | |
Your comment was surely well meant, but you could have plainly stated that the article author is a seasoned reporter instead of the snarky reply. GP might be incorrect in stating that the author is parroting Anthropic's marketing, but the author certainly does not go out of his way to specify that these are only Anthropic's claims. It is actually a bit ironic as the article linked[0] from the quoted part (by another author) uses the correct phrasing when dealing with such claims: > Anthropic, the artificial intelligence company that recently fought the Pentagon over the use of its technology, has built a new A.I. model that it claims is too powerful to be released to the public. | ||