| ▲ | sebtron 6 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> I expected gnome-terminal's memory usage to be in line with konsole (KDE's default terminal), but gnome-terminal shows remarkably well in this test In tipical GNOME fashion, they have decided to replace this largely working piece of software with on with one that places solidly at the bottom of the article's list (ptyxis). | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | audidude 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Almost all of that is Mesa shaders and GTK's CPU side font-cache for GL/Vulkan, compiled CSS state, FWIW. If you run: GSK_RENDERER=cairo ptyxis -s You can verify that with 69,985 here RES and 52,428 of that SHR. With 5 tabs open it jumped to 71,208 here. Presumably for the encrypted scrollback pre-allocations. You still may not choose to use it, but it should stay relatively similar the more tabs you open. Also, it's not a core GNOME app. It's just an app I wrote for me that the distros seem to have liked for its design/platform integration. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | scheme271 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ptyxis has a few features that gnome-terminal doesn't and which are really handy. Namely, being able to list containers running on the system and then being able to select one to get a terminal running inside the container. Not sure that warrants replacing gnome-terminal but it is really handy if you use containers a lot. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | kokada 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Wait, what? ptyxis is not the default GNOME termjnal. It is the terminal of choice for both Ubuntu and Fedora, but the default terminal in GNOME is Console, internally known as kgx: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Terminal. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||