>I've tried reporting them to ICANN and never received a response.

So ICANN is complicit too? After all, if we adopt your interpretation, in some way ICANN is also turning an blind eye, both to what cloudflare is supposedly doing and also to what the domain registrars are doing.

▲

Xirdus an hour ago | parent [-]

ICANN doesn't get any kickbacks from Canonical needing to protect itself as far as I can tell. Cloudflare literally sells the protection.

▲

joemi an hour ago | parent [-]

So ICANN is alright because they're protecting them for free, but Cloudflare is bad because they're protecting them for money?

	▲	Xirdus 31 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		In a way, yes, that makes it more okay. You can't have a conflict of interest if you have no interest. Cloudflare has clear interest in hosting the malicious actors and it's in clear conflict with providing services to their other users.