The whole premise of this site is very negative and pessimistic in nature. Why the emphasis on "killed", rather than "innovated" or "created"?

The expectation should not be for products to last for ever.

And for each product that happened, more products came after that were inspired by it.

newshackr 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That is also the case for many of the products on the Google killed by lists.

justsomehnguy 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Not everyone has the urge to replace absolutely everything with the same deal but with a positive spin. Lottery factor, unaliving etc.

	▲	sgt 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		That's not what I mean. I like having products, but you can't really truly innovate if you insist on keeping products that may not make sense. That's why Google, Apple etc eventually cut products. Google's list is pretty extreme though.

Ever heard of killedbygoogle.com?