It's a shame he seems to reject the idea of actually diving in and using these tools interactively:

> It’s not that I would have a lot of time to explore lots of different prompts and doing deep dive adventures anyway.

His expertise I think would elevate the results quite a bit. Although if he never uses LLMs, which it reads like he doesn't, I guess it might backfire just as well. Prompting style (still?) does matter after all, certainly in my experience anyways.

▲

jph00 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

He states in the article that they use LLMs for this purpose and find them extremely useful.

	▲	perching_aix 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Which can be true without this also being true: > using these tools interactively I did read the article. It seems to me they're using LLMs in a prepared manner instead, as mere scanners that produce reports.

▲

OtherShrezzing an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

He posts about his use of language models a lot on Mastodon[0]. He does lots with language models, but doesn't buy all the way into the hype. I'd say he's one of. most reasonable & balanced voices on the subject of AI use in software today. Happy to use the technology, more than willing to push back on marketing bs.

[0] https://mastodon.social/@bagder