| ▲ | kyleee 13 hours ago |
| No doubt there is corruption; but it’s also momentum. There aren’t stable and good alternatives for so many reasons so the duopoly has momentum |
|
| ▲ | varispeed 13 hours ago | parent [-] |
| I understand, but this is a national security matter. The focus should be on developing matching domestic capability. |
| |
| ▲ | cyanydeez 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | you know that domestic capability means putting taxes to take things into a public good and corporations and paranoia are the bigger problem to overcome than anything technical. Any endevour will be cast as some kind of fascist takeover of governance. | | |
| ▲ | bornfreddy 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | Well no, there is no need to develop domestic capability. Put laws in effect which disable foreign capabilities and which reward domestic ones, and they will be developed. No endeavor from government needed (which is a good thing, since governments are not really great at doing such stuff). | | |
| ▲ | cyanydeez 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | Well yes, just because you think it's a public good worth competing over doesn't mean there's anyone who thinks it's a viable business model. |
|
|
|
