|
| ▲ | HPsquared 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Free trade doesn't always benefit everyone equally, only a net benefit overall. It's a bit like how people often misinterpret the second law of thermodynamics "but the entropy decreased when the ice froze!" |
|
| ▲ | ZeroGravitas 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Economists would say that the money coming in outweighs the higher costs and therefore you could redistribute that money and everyone comes out ahead. Whether that happens in real life is a different question. |
| |
| ▲ | joe_mamba 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | >Economists would say that the money coming in Does that money go directly into my pocket so I can afford the more expensive energy? Or does it go into the pocket of private energy companies? Because I feel like there's some faults with this "free market", which is mostly just socializing losses and privatizing profits. | | |
| ▲ | HPsquared 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | And what if the energy companies are owned by foreign investors? | | |
| ▲ | joe_mamba 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | That would be economic colonialism with extra steps. But for the end user, whether you're being ripped off by a local or a foreign energy oligarch, it doesn't really matter, people just want to pay less. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | ViewTrick1002 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Electricity is expensive in Central Europe because the ETS system (carbon trading) has made fossil based production expensive. We’re right in the middle of the transition with maximum volatility swinging between extremely cheap renewables and expensive fossil plants. |