LLM models can only predict the next token.

The can't predict the consequences of an action predicting one token after another. They can't solve a Rubik's Cube unlike a 7 year old human who can learn to do it in a weekend. They can't imagine the perspective of being a human being unlike a 7 year old human if asked to imagine they where in the position of another human.

Those are very strong claims, do you really believe an LLM can't be trained to solve Rubik's Cubes?

Can you imagine what if feels like to be a LLM?

Can one LLM have a better sensation of what it feels like to be a different LLM (say one that score a little better?)?

You design circularly defined criteria...