| ▲ | bluegatty 4 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I used to be with you on that ... but getting of my lazy bum to actually pay for Spotify - and looking past all the fair/unfair issues bad/good corporate stuff ... The ability to browse music is very powerful. I lost my 1 Soundgarden CD 20 years ago. Now I can listen to all their albums. You can do the entire Beatles catalogue <- this is a different form of listening. Discover artists I would never have otherwise heard of. It has it's downsides, but I dont think CD was 'better'. We just have an imperfect situation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | AlexandrB 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
And the biggest part of the money you pay the streaming platform goes to neither Soundgarden, nor the remaining Beatles, nor to those artists you discovered but to Taylor Swift[1]. This is in stark contrast to how CD economics worked. As someone who spent a lot of his youth carefully avoiding big label acts and trying to support small artists, this is what bothers me the most: there is no way to do that anymore if you use streaming. [1] https://mertbulan.com/2025/08/10/why-paying-for-spotify-most... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||