> that has led to a 10X increase in the speed of software development.

> AI is the silver bullet - my output is genuinely 10X what it was before claude code existed.

Those are not the same.

You can add 5 different features to a project and still provide less value that the 5 lines diff that resolves a performance bottleneck.

▲

jrumbut 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I agree with this sentiment but I think LLMs are really close to the Brooks idea of a silver bullet.

I don't know if, overall, it's a 10x improvement or 6x or 14x but it's a serious contender. Part of it is the LLMs are very uneven in their performance across domains. If all I build is simple landing pages, it might be a 100x improvement. If I work on more complex, proprietary work where there aren't great examples in the training data then it might be a 10% improvement (it helps me write better comments or something)

	▲	BlackFly 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		All available evidence points to it being an incremental improvement at best. Higher claims are attributable to the psychological effect of the AI sycophancy problem which erases the Dunning-Kruger effect and makes even experts extremely overconfident. You still have to read the output of your LLM. Learning by reading alone and not doing is not nearly as effective.

▲

winrid 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

"claude, connect to a k8s pod in prod and grab a 30s cpu profile, analyze and create a performance test locally for the top outlier, verify your fix and create a PR"