new | show | ask | jobs Github

jatora 3 hours ago

And just like the author, you offer no rational justification for the argument you are making.

▲

presbyterian 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Aesthetic taste isn’t (inherently) rational? I don’t need a reason to find something ugly, I can just find it ugly.

▲

Maxatar 3 hours ago | parent [-]

No one is arguing against that point.

	▲	arduanika an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Did you read the subthread you are commenting on? The GP of your post, jatora, was literally arguing against that point. Right there. Is jatora "nobody"? Or are you illiterate (on top of belligerently having no taste)?

▲

aggakake 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Demanding a rational explanation for why something is considered tacky is a tacky look

▲

Unai 3 hours ago | parent [-]

This community is mostly based around sharing ideas, not feelings.

	▲	happytoexplain 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		That's a fallacy. This community is rational. Feelings are exactly as rational as ideas. You can use feelings to express irrationality - but as humans, we are 100% composed of feelings. Every rational thought we have is rooted in feelings. It's completely valid and interesting to talk about the feelings of some technology's impact, especially regarding visual art.
	▲	binary132 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		The fact (not feeling) is that most people feel a certain way about AI slop.

▲

Kapura 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If people think a piece of art is AI, the impression is that you didn't spend any amount of time or effort on creating it (even if you did, which, hilarious if true. you could have been making real art). Further, the vocal anti-AI art people who view it as a product created by grinding down billions of person-hours of experience and work into a sort of uniform slurry which is then fed back to them. They do not appreciate this meal.

	▲	soerxpso 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Half of his recommendations for alternatives take less time to make. You (and the author) are making assumptions about what "people in general" think without any data to back it up. What you've experienced anecdotally in your social circle doesn't necessarily apply everywhere.

▲

emccue 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I mean, there is rational justification for why people feel the way they do.

It turns into a long tirade about how AI has made the median person's life worse and how they associate generated images with that. It could also be a short tirade.

But the point is more that it is that way, its not important (for the purposes of choosing whether to use AI art in a thing you distribute) _why_ people feel this way though, just that they do.

▲

zapataband1 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

people can like bad art dude, you do you (it's still bad)