| ▲ | mbauman 9 hours ago | |
Well the comments tend to be superfluous "whats" (describing the code itself) instead of the more helpful "whys." And they're almost never the most useful "why nots". | ||
| ▲ | andybak 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
That's different to my (recent) experience. I get fairly insightful "whys". At least on bugfix commits. | ||
| ▲ | idle_zealot 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> And they're almost never the most useful "why nots". Really? I find that Claude really likes to write "why nots" in comments when iterating on implementations and fixing bugs, to the extent that the comments grow into spot-logs of overly-specific documentation of what was tried and why it was scrapped. | ||