The tech section:

> Of course, the point of binding arbitration was never to create a streamlined system of justice – it was to bring about a world of no justice, where you have no right to sue. It's part of the decades-old "tort reform" movement that the business lobby has used to take away your right to sue altogether. Any time you hear about a seemingly crazy lawsuit (like the urban legends about the McDonald's "hot coffee" case), you're being propagandized for a world without legal consequences for companies that defraud you, steal from you, injure you, or kill you:

> https://pluralistic.net/2022/06/12/hot-coffee/#mcgeico

> That's why companies (like Bluesky) are now trying terms of service that also ban you from mass arbitration, while retaining the right to consolidate claims into a mass arbitration case if that's advantageous to them:

> https://pluralistic.net/2025/08/15/dogs-breakfast/#by-clicki...

> But Keller keeps finding creative ways around binding arbitration. He's currently bringing thousands of arbitration claims against Google, on behalf of advertisers whom Google stole from (Google is a thrice-convicted monopolist, and they lost a case last year over their monopolization of ad-tech, where they were found to have defrauded advertisers).

> capitalists really hate capitalism

Like conservatives hate conservatism!

“One virtue is greater than two, for it is more of a knot for one’s destiny to cling to”

- Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Nietzsche