Remix clone Hacker News

new | show | ask | jobs Github

	▲	antonvs an hour ago
		> Turns out Mexico doesn't legally require a passport for entry This isn't true. See e.g. https://consulmex.sre.gob.mx/washington/index.php/ligavisos/... : > "All foreigners, regardless of their nationality, are required to present a valid and not expired passport or travel document when entering Mexico (traveling by air, land or sea)." What you may have observed is Mexican border control at a small crossing may not enforce that requirement.
	▲	mothballed an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Article 11 [Mexican Constitution] Every person has the right to enter and leave the country, to travel through its territory and to move house without the necessity of a letter of safe passage, passport, safe-conduct or any other similar requirement. In the event of criminal or civil liability, the exercise of this right shall be subject to the judicial authority. Relating to limitations imposed by the laws on immigration and public health, or in respect to undesirable aliens residing in the country, the exercise of this right shall be subject to the administrative authority. In case of political persecution, any person has the right to seek political asylum, which will be provided for humanitarian reasons. The law shall regulate the cases in which political asylum should be provided, as well as the exceptions. Every person has the right to enter the country without a passport. There are ways for the authorities to get around it and fuck with people found in the interior without it (says subject to administrative authority for immigration, but they're explicitly constitutionally barred from requiring anything like a passport) , but ultimately it's unconstitutional to make a law requiring it. This trumps the aspirational hearsay provided by the consulate and explains why none of the consulate advice is able to cite where this supposed "requirement" comes from. https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Mexico_2015#s...