| ▲ | logicchains 7 hours ago |
| Very bold of them expecting people to use a language with a closed source compiler in the 2020s. |
|
| ▲ | evertheylen 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| If you're looking for a language that aims to solve the "two-language problem" like Mojo, but want something more open, more mature and less influenced by VC funding, check out Julia: https://julialang.org/ |
| |
| ▲ | runarberg 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | I used Julia a lot when I was studying statistics (which I dropped out of) back in 2015, but I recently (like last weekend) came back to it to write a prototype of a supervised learning model, and I have to say, coming back to it was pure joy. And my model prototype was indeed fast enough for me. Now I will probably rewrite the model in rust if I want to do anything with it (mostly for the web assembly target as I want this thing to run in browsers) but I will for sure be using Julia for further experimentation. Lovely language. |
|
|
| ▲ | ainch 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| They've said they'll open source the compiler alongside the 1.0 release. |
|
| ▲ | walterlw 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| from what I understand the goal for now is not to get the people to use it, but for enthusiasts to try it |
| |
| ▲ | kstrauser 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | What enthusiast worth getting feedback from is going to tinker with a locked up language? | | |
| ▲ | melodyogonna 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | You'd be surprised. Anyway, the compiler will be opened with 1.0 release, that's why reaching beta is exciting. |
|
|