| ▲ | dnautics 3 hours ago | |
Yes. Humans are also unreliable and nondeterministic (though certainly more reliable). Accordingly we have built software dev practices around this. I imagine it would be super useful for example to have a "TDD enforcer": Phase 1: only test files may be altered, exactly one new test failure must appear. Phase 2: only code files may be altered. The phase is cleared when the test now succeeds and no other tests fail. If you get stuck, bail and ask for guidance | ||
| ▲ | ManWith2Plans 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |
I've been busy building and dogfooding open-artisan for my own development purposes. I've diverged quite a bit from main and am hoping to merge some of those changes back soon. It's basically an OpenCode plugin that forces open-code token-hungry state machine that tries to map the engineering process I follow, exposing only valid tools and states at every step of development. If you're interested, in following along or trying it out, it's available here: https://github.com/yehudacohen/open-artisan/ Hopefully, I'll merge in my large structural changes in the next couple of weeks. These structural changes will enhance the state machine meaningfully, as well as adding support for hermes agenet. | ||