| ▲ | derwiki 2 hours ago | |
How is this novel? Just sounds like the “lifestyle creep” trap of just always wanting slightly nicer FWIW I think SFUSD changes the public/private math a little: you can live in a 3m house and the neighborhood school for you is 2/10 on great schools or less. I’m not saying this rating scale is perfect but am saying that 2/10 is probably pretty bad. Also FWIW 1/3 of the school age kids in SF go private. | ||
| ▲ | neogodless 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
The main difference is "lifestyle creep" is an individual problem / choice. You make more, but you spend more of it. Your lifestyle is improved, but there's a diminishing rate of return. The collective "lifestyle creep" where the consumers are competing can cost everyone more while resulting in worse outcomes overall. Almost like reverse capitalism. Instead of producers / sellers competing (on quality and price), there is just so much demand from consumers that they are forced to sacrifice quality while paying a higher price. | ||
| ▲ | alephnerd 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
That's why SF houses are significantly cheaper than their equivalents in suburbs like Palo Alto, Tri-Valley, Lamoraga, Marin, etc. Or lemme put it this way - $1.5 million buys you a single family home with a backyard in outer sunset, but only buys you a townhouse with no backyard in the Tri-Valley, but the family in outer sunset will have to send their kid to a private while the Tri-Valley household kid will attend some of the best public schools in the nation. | ||
| ▲ | wat10000 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Back in the stone age we called this "keeping up with the Joneses." | ||
| ▲ | timr an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Also, you step in poop on the way to school. | ||