What's up with all the sarcasm in your comment? It makes it hard to tell when you're speaking the truth versus speaking in opposites. Why not just speak plainly, so people can understand you -- comprehension should be the first goal. You're trying to communicate a serious matter.

Imagine reading a medical abstract, like the one you linked, if it were written in your style of heavy sarcasm.

> They are just going to shine some light into your veins and/or inject disinfectants into you, and your suffering will be over in no time.

Please cut out the sheer nonsense.

▲

sixtyj 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

She/he probably reads The Onion a lot and has caught the sarcasm bug.

▲

SAI_Peregrinus 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Those were Trump's proposed solutions to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Their post is quite clear: the US has an utterly incompetent administration which is actively opposed to the best known method for preventing the spread of deadly viruses: vaccines. Funding for monitoring the spread of diseases has also been cut. The World Cup is a large event which will bring people from all over the world into the US and into close contact for multiple days, right as a new dangerous virus with a long incubation period has been detected spreading from person to person.

	▲	OutOfHere 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The post is unnecessarily political, and is written quite unclearly. The administration certainly will fund a new vaccine if the situation merits it. The Covid mRNA vaccine, while lifesaving, is not without safety issues. It increases carditis risk substantially[1] (5x the baseline risk in males), and I personally experienced this effect for a month. It is best not to neglect such safety issues, ideally so they might be addressed in future protocols. [1]: Risk for carditis tied to second dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine: https://medicalxpress.com/news/2022-01-carditis-tied-dose-pf...