|
| ▲ | tolerance 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Right. But "in the end" people who participate in "permacomputing" per the websites stated values represent a subset of nerds. I think the rebuttal we're commenting on oversimplifies this. |
|
| ▲ | lynx97 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Well, yes, but no. Hacker Community projects increasingly force political agendas on participants. It gets harder and harder to just do tech stuff without having to align with some cabal. |
| |
| ▲ | stackghost 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Being apolitical just means your politics align with the status quo. Technology is inherently political in nature, because it affects society in material ways. | | |
| ▲ | Joker_vD 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > because it affects society in material ways. I'm fairly certain the word for that is "economical". Of course, the politics grows out of the economical relationships, but they are still different things: changes in technology may or may not change the political climate (I am fairly certain that an invention of e.g. a tin can opener did not have any noticeably political effects). | |
| ▲ | lynx97 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | "If you are not supporting us, you are the enemy" isn't a valid take. But it shows nicely the sentiment which turns me off regarding politics in tech. You can't even stay neutral, because someone will force you to align with their values. "My way or the highway" pretty much. |
|
|
