So if it's not guillotines and instead massed autonomous attack drones that would be an acceptable way to discuss violence?

Just want to make sure I understand you fully.

▲

tomhow an hour ago | parent [-]

Please don't, in one comment, call me “naive and childish” then try this kind of switcheroo the next. The topic of “guillotines” relates to performative violence against fellow citizens over political/economic disagreement. National defense is a different topic. They're both important topics and if they’re going to be discussed they deserve to be discussed earnestly. Glorification of violence has never been within the guidelines or norms on HN.

	▲	ethanwillis 32 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Right so then that answers my question. Violence is okay as long as it is directed outwards and said to be defensive, thank you for answering. I'll remember this when my country of which i'm a citizen uses these same defensive weapons to secure any mineral wealth in Australia.