Your logic is, "nothing's perfect so everything is equally good (or bad)".

Which is not true in this case.

For better and sometimes worse, the process through which medical drugs and procedures come to market, including studies and trials, is heavily regulated.

The Egg Board, however, is free to choose whichever studies to fund they prefer, and will gravitate to ones likely to show the positive effects of eggs and avoid ones likely to show the opposite.

The content of the paper may be entirely legitimate, but it still actually tells us nothing about whether we should eat more eggs or not.