I think I'm just too opinionated to go there. If I see something that works fine, but isn't the way I'd do it, it doesn't matter if a human or an LLM wrote it I'm still in there making it match my vision.

▲

jstummbillig 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That's not how most organizations work, AI or not.

▲

jf22 4 hours ago | parent [-]

What do you mean?

	▲	jstummbillig 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Organizations usually are not looking for employees who change things that work fine, just because it disagrees with the "vision" of one employee.

▲

suzzer99 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

100%. I don't think any senior programmer ever looks at another developer's code and says, "Oh yeah, that's just the way I'd do it."

▲

cortesoft 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

But I assume you don't go and change all your co-workers code just because they didn't do it how you would have done it?

	▲	jcgrillo 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Even the most toxic places I've worked that kind of behavior would totally get you canned.

▲

hirvi74 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I concur, and I think that is one of the most difficult aspects of reviewing another's code. It's difficult for me to sometimes differentiate between what is acceptable vs. what I would have done. I have to be very conscious to not impose my ideals.

▲

ai_slop_hater 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

So you are going to waste everyone's time getting another developer to write code the way you want? This resonates with me because at my company I get this all the time. At that point, you might as well close my PR and do it yourself, whatever way you want. I really like the advice from the book 0 2 1, to assign different areas of responsibility to people, so that there is no conflict.

	▲	suzzer99 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> So you are going to waste everyone's time getting another developer to write code the way you want? No one is suggesting that.