| ▲ | yummybrainz 2 hours ago | |
I'm assuming the intended meaning is that this was the first time the approach led to "realistic" sound? | ||
| ▲ | Dropoutjeep 4 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
If this is their definition of "realistic" sound then I'm horrified | ||
| ▲ | moralestapia 18 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |
That's also not the case. There have been some really accurate physically-modeled instruments for at least 20 years. Also, aschkually, a violin is on the "easier" end of making it sound realistic. It's one of the "tutorial" models you go through when you start learning about this (resonators + reverb get you 80% there). Much harder to do any plucking sound (guitar, piano), and much much harder to model percussions accurately (cymbals, drums) and in such a way that the sound doesn't come out dry and very evidently synthetic. Source: I was very invested into this in the 2000s, although as a hobby, not professionally. | ||