What are the altruistic aspects of operating a corporate entity that effectively operates as a casino where you can bet on literally anything?

Did they incorporate as a PBC?

Is there actual case law of people using a company's status as a PBC to effectively hold it to account for detrimental corporate conduct?

I think you might be misreading my comment as if I was defending Polymarket. I'm disputing the claim that "jurisdiction shopping is always sketchy".