Remix.run Logo
thayne an hour ago

Probably the most common reason to use DNSSEC is to check a box on a list of compliance rules. And I don't think this will change anything for people who need DNSSEC for compliance.

tptacek 35 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

There's no commercial compliance regime that requires DNSSEC (FedRAMP might be the only exception --- I'm uncertain about the current state of FedRAMP DNSSEC rules --- but that makes sense given that DNSSEC is a giant key escrow scheme.)

pocksuppet 32 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Probably the most common reason to use TLS is to check a box on a list of compliance rules. Is that bad?

weird-eye-issue 8 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Do browsers even load non-HTTPS sites anymore without a massive warning?

liveoneggs 15 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

browsers pushed it, not compliance