| ▲ | bix6 6 hours ago | |
Why didn’t we do this? Seems cool. | ||
| ▲ | boc 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Because it's like 1000x more efficient to move stuff on water vs land, so industrial cities clustered around ports and rivers since it's way easier to move stuff around. | ||
| ▲ | zonkerdonker 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Big cities aren't typically in such an ideal planar geological setup as that. I'm having a hard time imagining how something like that would work in the Bay area, NYC, Seattle, Miami etc | ||
| ▲ | sophacles 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Because it trades most of the benefits of cities for the hassle of suburban life and less efficient food production. | ||
| ▲ | HoldOnAMinute 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Because of perverse incentives | ||
| ▲ | TimorousBestie 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
To be fair, Alexander was writing in the seventies, long after automobiles and the suburb had killed any hope of humane urban planning in the States. | ||