Remix.run Logo
s0ss 3 days ago

If you don’t actively protect your trademark, you risk losing your trademark. Im surprised that isn’t part of his reasoning.

joe_mamba 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

It's not about losing your trademark but about someone you don't know and can't yet trust, potentially using your trademark for their own goals. It'd be like letting someone use your name and social security number to identify themselves. You wouldn't want that even if it's a friend, let alone a stranger you never met in person.

Let's say the IRGC, Mossad or NSA is behind that developer of the Notepad++ on Mac clone and would love to piggyback on your trademark name in order to push a spyware infected app on to some targets. You don't know them and can't trust them so you don't want them using your name because that would backfire on you.

There's plenty of precedent with this in browser extensions, where once they become super popular they end up being sold and bought by some shady Israeli PE or ad-tech company with ties to Mossad. You don't want your name or trademark anywhere near this, if you value it, so you'll have to call out and ban everyone who tries to use it without your explicit permission.

This isn't the developer trying to be a dick to other developers, this is the developer exercising common sense and self preservation.

ButlerianJihad 2 days ago | parent [-]

A PR from the MANPADS codebase is always a dead giveaway

ASalazarMX 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Don Ho mixes politics with his work, thus Notepad++ has been targeted in the past by state-sponsored hackers to deliver malware. A vibe/agent coded fork (it was made just last March) is a huge security risk, the brand weakening is just the cherry on the cake.

Of course I'd prefer for Don Ho to voice his political opinions through more appropriate channels, but it is what it is.

tfrancisl 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

2 questions. First, how does a vibe coded / generated fork or derivation pose security risks to the original work? Second, what is a "more appropriate channel" to express his opinions than the platform he has as a maintainer of a massively popular project?

I would argue that we don't see enough open source developers presenting their political or social views in the context of their works.

fragmede 3 days ago | parent [-]

The security risk is I Google for "notepad++ Mac", because I have a Mac, and get malware served up to me.

The appropriate channel for other people to voice their politics is anywhere else, so that ASalazarMX doesn't have interact with it and gets to pretend everything's okay.

ASalazarMX a day ago | parent [-]

Since you answered the first question, I'll answer the second according to my original intent.

The appropriate channel for voicing politics and ideology would be my personal accounts, not a software utility. Would you enjoy if your generous neighbor offered to mow your lawn for free, but left political messages on it?

I've rarely contributed to, or released something open source, but I know it's unprofessional to mix personal and work subjects, and open source is work, even if you do it for free.

And to counter the visibility argument, I followed Don Ho on Twitter, now on BlueSky, and actually enjoy his publications even when they aren't strictly work related.

Barbing 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Would it then be natural to mention the trademark defense issue?

ASalazarMX a day ago | parent [-]

It was unusual it wasn't mentioned, yes. I assumed it was so obvious he decided not to emphasize it, but fortunately this has now been resolved.