| ▲ | lowbloodsugar 4 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Humans aren’t any better. That’s why we have OSHA etc. I think you’re hoping for a formal logic based AI and I’ll wager no such thing will ever exist - and if it do, it would try to kill us all. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | yubblegum 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> Humans aren’t any better We're different. People have fairly consistent faults. LLMs are nondeterministic even in terms of how they fail. A high value human resource can be counted on to deliver. That, imho, is in fact one of the primary roles of good management: putting the right person in the appropriate position. Process engineering has worked to date because both the human and mechanical components of a system fail in predictable ways and we can try to remedy that. This is the golden bug of the current crop of "AI". | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jmalicki 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Formal logic AI systems have existed and were popular in the 1980s. One of the problems is that they don't work - in the real world there are no firm facts, everything is squishy, and when you try to build a large system you end up making tons of exceptions for special cases until it becomes completely untenable. Non-deterministic systems that work probabilistically are just superior in function to that, even if it makes us all deeply uncomfortable. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||