| ▲ | derangedHorse 2 hours ago | |||||||
Does anyone else find the writing in the article to be overdramatic? Including a 4gb is a negligible amount of space for current hardware and Chrome is not known as the browser to run on resource constrained devices. To put 4gb in context, I currently have 2 *tabs* open that nearly take up 4gb. The fact Chrome also has a way to disable this makes it kind of a nothingburger in my opinion. > The roughly 4 GB × N devices of disk-storage cost, sustained, on user hardware. SSDs have a per-GB embodied carbon cost of approximately 0.16 kg CO2e per GB of NAND manufactured [18] The estimated environmental aspect of the download also seems like an overblown point, noted for sensationalism. There are always hand-wavy numbers involved and I had to look no further than the quote above to find evidence of this. The reference for [18], "The dirty secret of SSDs: embodied carbon", incorrectly links to "Toward Carbon-Aware Networking" and makes no mention of the environmental cost of SSDs. After looking up "The Dirty Secret of SSDs: Embodied Carbon" myself, I was able to see the same methodologies as I was expecting used [1]. > We conducted an analysis encompassing 94 Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) reports, which collectively quantify the embodied cost of SSDs. Owing to the scarcity of direct and up-to-date LCA studies focused specifically on SSDs. We compiled a dataset comprising LCA reports pertaining to Server, Workstation, Desktop, Laptop, and Chromebook products, all of which feature SSDs All these studies rely on metrics extrapolated from layered assumptions and end up being used by those who try to use them as objective numbers. | ||||||||
| ▲ | Zekio 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
4gb isn't really a negligible amount, given the amount of desktops and laptops sold with just a 256gb ssd | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | ElFitz 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
> Including a 4gb is a negligible amount of space for current hardware and Chrome is not known as the browser to run on resource constrained devices. 4gb definitely isn’t a negligible amount of space on most people’s devices. The quite successful it would seem MacBook Neo has 256GB of storage in its base configuration. A MacBook Air and a basic sub $1000 Dell laptop starts at 512GB. > To put 4gb in context, I currently have 2 tabs open that nearly take up 4gb. You are conflating disk and memory. > The fact Chrome also has a way to disable this makes it kind of a nothingburger in my opinion. There’s a reason they picked an opt-out model for this, and not an opt-in approach. But I also see the point in it. We recently did a hackathon, and I considered relying on Gemma 4 for privacy considerations. The local model could interpret the user’s natural language request and derive less privacy revealing requests to form based on that. But then, a web app that shows people a loading screen while it downloads a 4GB model probably wouldn’t be a best-selling UX. | ||||||||
| ||||||||