| ▲ | brailsafe 4 hours ago | |||||||
This is just a coined term; definitions evolve over time based on usage | ||||||||
| ▲ | kelnos an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Then "vibe coding" is a useless term, if it just means "LLM-assisted coding". We might as well just say "LLM-assisted coding" or "AI coding" or whatever. As much as I find the word "vibe" generally annoying (in all contexts), I actually really like "vibe coding" as "LLM did everything and I didn't even look at it". It's a succinct, useful way to describe that mode of doing things. Diluting it down to "LLM-assisted coding" makes it useless. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | gschizas 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
All language is "coined terms". The point is that if you dilute the definition of a term, you make the term useless. Evolution of a term isn't done automatically. Correcting terms such as these pushed the evolution in a more useful way. Also, evolution of language is not a magic spell that automatically forgives people on making language mistakes. | ||||||||