In practice all use of AI rapidly becomes vibe coding. Even if someone says they're going to carefully manually review everything that's generated, within a couple of days they get bored and just click approve.

▲

jmull 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

While I'm sure you're speaking for many, this is definitely not true across the board.

▲

markatto 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is just a matter of priorities - I use LLMs to write code every day and I have never put a single line of code up for review that I didn’t read and understand.

	▲	pineapple_opus an hour ago \| parent [-]
		I use to do this and then do test manually to validate everything works as expected in my small open source project. But then over the time I saw that some bugs crept in which I was unable track since I was doing manual testing. So I wrote some e2e tests with playwright and I think that gives a bit relief (at least).

▲

p-e-w 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Not to mention that manually writing code is itself a process of understanding. It cannot be replicated by reading code, no matter how carefully.

▲

smohare 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]