After the Microsoft acquisition GH marketing and pricing put an immense amount of effort[1] into trying to kill secondary platforms that integrated into github and move more corporate accounts fully on-platform. We recently dropped travis for github actions and dropped reviewable for github PRs (which are terrible).

There's a portion of this that is agentic driven and there's a portion of this that's just github making their own bed.

1. Arguably anticompetitive pricing like MSFT is used to doing with the office suite.

▲

foolswisdom 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

In other words, the set of github core services has expanded because you don't use third party tooling for some of those services anymore.

	▲	munk-a 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		For us, yes - and likely for a lot of other users. I'm not certain who else has dealt with the headache of being migrated off their legacy pricing plan but it ends up pushing those internal offerings a lot harder than the old approach did so if they're seeing successful conversions it's likely they're seeing significantly more load from mature codebases with expensive CI/CD pipelines.

▲

blks 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

That sounds like their classic EEE