Remix.run Logo
pluc 7 hours ago

It isn't. Lots of unacceptable things going on these days and everyone seems to be accepting them just fine.

steve1977 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I think it's like some kind of collective inferiority complex. Nobody really understands things anymore but everyone is afraid to point out mistakes of others because they are scared to come under scrutiny themselves then.

adityashankar 4 hours ago | parent [-]

I don't think it's an inferiority complex, negativity sells more and carefully understanding things doesn't sell as much

tardedmeme 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

We should make an alternative git site, but how to acquire users?

go_elmo 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Make it nerdy enough to scare of agentic coders only. Also, blackjack and hookers are said to be helpful in such circumstances.

mghackerlady 7 hours ago | parent [-]

sourcehut is pretty close

dd8601fn 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Forgejo is a thing. But the headlines lately make it sound like it’s not in great shape either.

abnercoimbre 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Could you expand? I couldn't find anything relevant after a few search attempts.

dd8601fn 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Yeah, look for HN headlines with forgejo and carrot (iirc). It made a lot of noise in the last couple weeks.

tantalor 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What do you need users for?

GH is not a social network

tardedmeme 7 hours ago | parent [-]

I don't know. Everyone seems to be using GitHub only because everyone else is using GitHub. Apparently that's important somehow. Me, I use "git init"

01HNNWZ0MV43FF 6 hours ago | parent [-]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_effect

It's a lot easier to get bug reports and fixes when everyone is on the same auth system.

That's why there is also a call for federated forges

tardedmeme 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Why is it easier to submit a bug report if my bug reporting system is run by the same company as your code repository? Why are those things even slightly related?

tantalor 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> same auth system

I'm confused with auth has to do with it?

We've had OAuth 2.0 since 2012

chrisjj 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> We should make an alternative git site, but how to acquire users?

Buy ad space on Github's outage page?

01HNNWZ0MV43FF 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

codeberg is doing fine

Anon1096 3 hours ago | parent [-]

If measured the same way, ie combined status across all products, then codeberg is also at a whopping 0 9s.

https://status.codeberg.org/status/codeberg

afro88 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Guarantee enterprises with SLAs aren't accepting them

maccard 6 hours ago | parent [-]

The thing about an SLA is that once you’ve broken it you’ve lost the trust. It doesn’t _really_ matter what the cost is for breaking it, nobody chooses their platform based on the refund they’ll get if they’re down. But they absolutely do choose based on reliability and uptime. The enterprise SLA refund credit will show as a (big) metering blip, but the problem is the people who signed the contracts are going to be speaking to Gitlab now

booleandilemma 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think the default position people like to take generally is to just go with the status quo. GitHub has reached status quo level. As in "nobody ever got fired for choosing GitHub". It's the only forge I've seen advertisements for in the meatspace, and even non-technical people know about it. On job applications, companies ask for my GitHub URL. I think it'll be awhile now before they get abandoned. That said, I recently started moving my stuff over to Codeberg. The change needs to start with us, the people writing software.

Retr0id 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I, for one, am not paying them enough money to expect any better.