Remix.run Logo
alt227 2 hours ago

> a battery that I don’t need to replace for 3-4 years anyway.

This is not just about battery replacement. I used to keep several fully charged batteries stocked in my rucksack whenever I went hiking or anywhere else that was remote. After a day of taking photos in the wild its nice to be able to just chuck in a fresh batttery and off you go.

I feel like this feature of phones was not only lost, but pretty much forgotten about after smartphones stopped including user replaceable batteries.

elzbardico 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

External battery banks are a far superior solution now that almost everything has standardized on USB and we have power banks supporting high speed charging.

They can be charged with the same power adapter you use to charge your phone, without the need of an extra docking thing.

They can be used to charge any USB-chargeable device.

They are not tied to your specific model, and thus you're not vendor locked with them, making them cheaper and easier to find anywhere in the world.

They come in multiple capacities, allowing you to plan in advance your energy needs and choose the right size bank for your situation.

They are far more sturdier than any modern battery, which makes them more resistant to puncture and bending.

They don't have external contacts that could potentially short in contact with conductive surfaces.

an hour ago | parent | next [-]
[deleted]
manoDev 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Lots of advantages, but one major downside: you can't pop the empty battery, put a new one and keep working.

There's a reason professional devices (e.g. cameras) still have replaceable batteries.

Aurornis 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The people who need this feature should go buy one of the phone models with replaceable batteries.

Reading the comments here, it's obvious that the replaceable battery fans can't even agree on what they want. One commenter wants the back covered in tens of screws for waterproofing. Other commenters want the battery quickly replaceable so they can do hot swaps without missing a beat. Some people are sharing links to phones that have replaceable batteries and getting responses from people saying they'd never buy that phone because it's too big, too ugly, or other reasons.

This is an impossible debate because one side has convinced themselves that it's possible to have their cake and eat it, too: They believe that removable batteries can be implemented without any tradeoffs and the only reason they're not removable is so the phones are forced to become e-waste, which requires you to ignore all of the low cost battery replacement services available.

MengerSponge 34 minutes ago | parent [-]

too many CS majors and not enough mechanical engineers on this forum

an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
titzer 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I use a lot of rechargeable AAA and AA batteries. They have lower voltage than alkaline batteries (by design apparently), which is not normally an issue, but sometimes is a deal breaker. E.g. my thermostat did not like lower voltage AA batteries and shut down prematurely a number of times.

There's challenges adopting standardized rechargeable batteries, e.g. trying to recharge alkaline batteries risks fire/explosion (and you know that will happen far too often given the number of people out there), but if we have had standard battery sizes, voltages, and capacities for rechargeable batteries, things would be so much better.

retired 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I have a magnetic wireless power bank that I put on my phone and I can continue using it as normal.

grey-area 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

But you can plug in the battery pack and keep working…

MagicMoonlight 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Nobody needs to do that with a mobile phone.

Aurornis 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> This is not just about battery replacement. I used to keep several fully charged batteries stocked in my rucksack whenever I went hiking or anywhere else that was remote.

There are several high end phones with removable batteries. You should buy one of them if this feature is important to you.

This movement to force everyone's phones to pay the costs of removable batteries to address these really niche use cases is not great.

alt227 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> he costs of removable batteries to address these really niche use cases

You seem to have completely missed the primary point of all this, which is to reducew ewaste. That fact that it also satisfies some niche uses cases is a great bonus!

dlisboa 5 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

External battery banks are a better reducer of e-waste as they'll work for all devices and not just the one cell phone.

Aurornis an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

> You seem to have completely missed the primary point of all this, which is to reducew ewaste.

Everyone acting like iPhones and mainstream Android phones become e-waste after 3 years is just making specious arguments.

Why does the average phone user know more about phone batteries and replacing them than all of these commenters acting like iPhones are becoming e-waste after a couple years?

I think I know more people with 4-6 year old iPhones than with an iPhone 17.

Apple stores will replace the battery for you for a very reasonable fee and the phone will carry on for many years more. This is a common thing to do and you can find battery replacement services for popular Android phones too.

SauntSolaire 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Replaceable batteries are one thing, but truly hot swappable batteries like you're asking for will absolutely effect the waterproofing and add a lot of weight/size. Is there a reason you can't just bring a battery pack in your rucksack? They make magnetic ones you can slap on the back and be on your way.

alt227 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Continuing to take photos with a battery pack hanging off a device is no where near as simple as popping in a fresh 100% battery and coninuing as normal.

strictnein 2 hours ago | parent [-]

These don't dangle or impede your use:

https://www.anker.com/products/a1665-5k-ultra-slim-qi2-power...

InsomniacL 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

just to note, wireless charging is very inefficient. From the page you linked:

"Due to a 30% to 45% energy loss in battery cells and conversion circuitry, a fully charged 5,000 mAh power bank typically offers an estimated 2,750 to 3,500mAh to power devices"

retired 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Then use the supplied USB-C to USB-C cable for more efficient charging, while using the magnets to stick it to the back of your phone.

mort96 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Is that ... just a wall wart with a screen on it? Why is that relevant?

EDIT: Wait no it's a carousel of completely unrelated products because the page redirected (without my input) to https://ankernordics.com/.

strictnein 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Hmmm... I'm not sure what you're seeing to be honest. The link should be to a slim 5000mah magsafe battery that attaches to the back of iPhones.

The Anker Nano Power Bank (5K, MagGo, Slim). No screen, charges via USBC.

mort96 an hour ago | parent [-]

Seems like this product, on the Anker Nordic page so that it works for us who for whatever reason are booted from the main Anker website: https://www.ankernordics.com/products/a1665-anker-nano-power...

Yeah, that would work. The first party Apple MagSafe power bank is also a decent alternative.

alt227 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Thanks for the suggestion.

I would still prefer replaceable batteries back though, and you really dont need to convince me otherwise!

detourdog 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You can keep several power bricks that will charge any USB-C device now.

alt227 2 hours ago | parent [-]

yes exactly my point, I dont want to wait to charge up my device with another device. I just want to pop in a fresh 100% battery. It used to be so simple.

detourdog 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

My powerbrick connects to the back of my phone. Form factor wise it's pretty close to my extra large StarTac removable battery that I would carry around.

alt227 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Bully for you!

Id like my user replaceable 100% full batteries back if its ok with you?

Aurornis 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Then go buy one of the phones with replaceable batteries?

https://www.androidcentral.com/best-android-phone-removable-...

detourdog 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Fine with me purchase any phone with that feature you want.

alt227 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Apologies, my coment came off a bit unecessarily aggressive.

It is my preference to have user replaceable batteries, and my belief is that they were only removed to make phones become obselete quicker and cause higher turnover of purchased phones.

No amount of battery packs can bring that back.

detourdog 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

No apologies needed. The market is just not working in your favor.

giantrobot an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

> It is my preference to have user replaceable batteries, and my belief is that they were only removed to make phones become obselete quicker and cause higher turnover of purchased phones.

My iPhone 12 is six years old. I replaced the battery last year. While it probably won't be workable on cellular networks in six years, outside of physical damage there's little reason it'll stop working. My original iPhone from 2007 still boots up and runs. There's no GSM service for it to talk to but it runs as a WiFi only iPod just fine if I really wanted.

The idea that non-replaceable batteries is a conspiracy to lower the lifetime of devices is sort of silly. Flagship phones are made of incredibly sturdy materials. If they were designed to be disposable they'd have a bunch of sacrificial structural elements to limit their lifetime. Instead they're built as well as they can possibly be built.

A flagship phone will be left behind in CPU power running bloated JavaScript blogs or cellular service long before any internal component fails. Non-replaceable batteries are about hitting a capacity/size target more than anything else. Replaceable batteries enforce constraints on a phone's design that non-replaceable ones do not have.

detourdog an hour ago | parent [-]

My 2018 car lost all it's connected features when the 3G network was shut down.

giantrobot 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

There's tons of MagSafe battery packs for iPhones. They charge the phone continuously. There's no need to let the phone drop to zero before attaching the battery pack. There's also cases with integral batteries. I assume there's Android equivalents for various phones.

I'd say these are more convenient than extra swappable batteries. They have integral charge controllers and charge via USB. There's no need to charge them in the phone or have to buy some extra external battery charger.

scottbez1 4 minutes ago | parent [-]

They’re incredibly wasteful due to inefficient power transfer which is a huge issue with wireless charging.

And it’s not just wireless that’s inefficient; with a usb connection you’ll typically lose at least 15% in a good buck/boost stage and there’s 2 involved in a usb battery pack: one in the battery pack itself to step up/down from pack voltage to the negotiated PD voltage, and then another lossy stage in the phone stepping down to 3.7v.