| ▲ | arduanika 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> It's an interesting piece. If you're twelve years old, maybe. > The luck of the draw. This is a core tenet of the Rawlsian religion, of which you are a (probably unwitting) fanatic. If you like questioning things so much, you should question why this thing you take for an eternal fact had to be invented in 1971, and what exactly it is propping up. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ninjagoo 2 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> This is a core tenet of the Rawlsian religion, of which you are a (probably unwitting) fanatic. Ouch. How warped does one's thinking have to be to call "A theory of justice" (1971) for pluralistic, democratic societies, a "religion"? It seems to me that right-wingers love hyperbole and rhetoric, without addressing the meat of the matter. Your post is no different, being entirely free of reason. A good day to you, Sir. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||